BILL ANALYSIS AB 1624 Date of Hearing: May 24, 1993 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON RULES John Burton, Chair AB 1624 (Bowen) - As Amended: May 18, 1993 SUBJECT Legislature: legislative information: access by computer modem. DIGEST Existing law explicitly requires the Legislature to provide notice of šmeetings and to open proceedings to the public. The Legislative Open šRecords Act (Govt. Code Sec. 9070, et seq.) and the Open Meetings Act of š1989 (Govt. Code Sec. 9027, et seq.) both serve to provide the public with šextensive knowledge of the process. Currently, the public has access to all bills and legislative documents šthrough the Capitol bill room. Bill texts, amendments, analyses and šrelated information are also available for a fee through several computer šinformation services, various law book companies, and newspapers. This bill: 1. Requires the Legislative Counsel, with the advice of the Joint Rules š Committee, to make available to the public specified legislative data in electronic form. 2. Reserves to the Legislative Counsel the right to charge a fee to any š user who subsequently sells the data. 3. Appropriates to the Legislative Counsel any moneys/funds received from š the above fees. FISCAL EFFECT The costs of creating the information are primarily borne by the šLegislative Counsel Bureau. Cost of preparing the data for release to špublic electronic networks will involve acquisition of gateways and servers šplus some software - continued - AB 1624 Page 1 AB 1624 creation. Legislative Counsel estimates costs at approximately $50,000. COMMENTS The Legislature presently makes hard copies of all documents available to šall libraries and colleges that request these documents (currently, 98 šlibraries and 61 colleges and universities statewide). Additionally, 1,718 šsubscribers receive various levels of bill service ranging from $140 for šthe Index to $2,545 for the full service (pick-up). A large body of potential users of legislative information in electronic šform exist. The appropriate format needed to serve the greatest number of šusers and the actual number of users is currently unknown. Without this šinformation, the difficulty of identifying a general format is greatly šincreased. The proposal to have volunteer programmers write access systems may have šthe effect of limiting the usefulness of the data since no central šinformation retrieval plan would prevail. The Internet (a worldwide network) is one of many systems which could šreceive the raw data. A format which enables Internet users to receive the šdata may exclude users of other networks. A study of the potential user groups and the most useful, efficient data šdistribution mode would clarify many of the ambiguities present in the bill šas drafted. RECOMMENDATION Request the Assembly Office of Research to undertake a two-month study šdesigned to identify the user groups and a format most likely to satisfy špublic information needs. In the absence of a study to provide insights into the public's computer šneeds and abilities, it is not known what format will best serve the špublic. Before this information is distributed, a means must be devised to šorganize it in a useful manner. Further, the legislature must ensure that šsubstantive changes to the information derived from the data do not occur. - continued - AB 1624 Page 2