BILL ANALYSIS
AB 1890
Page 1
CONCURRENCE IN SENATE AMENDMENTS
AB 1890 (Brulte)
As Amended June 19, 1996
Majority vote
ASSEMBLY: (July 24, 1995) SENATE: 40-0 (June 24, 1995)
(vote not relevant)
Original Committee Reference: U. & C.
SUMMARY: States the intent of the Legislature with respect to the
restructuring of the electrical services industry.
The Senate amendments:
1) Set forth issues which the Legislature has a necessary role in
resolving, in conjunction with the California Public Utilities
Commission (PUC) and the industry's efforts to restructure the
electrical services industry. The policy issues articulated in
this bill include:
a) The design of the new industry model to facilitate
competition in the generation of electricity;
b) Market power concerns.
c) Competition transition charge (CTC) calculation, including
definition of CTC, methodology for determining value of
stranded assets, and the imposition of CTC upon various
consumer classes with regard to time and method of the CTC
mechanism.
d) Future structure of the transmission and distribution
(T&D) system and related issues such as comparable access,
the role of the independent system operator, and the extent
of continuing regulation of T&D in order to ensure
continuing safety, reliability coupled with
cost-effectiveness.
e) Legislative review of all state-mandated programs related
to electrical service including, effectiveness of the
programs, role of a competitive market in maintaining such
programs, options for continued funding under restructured
industry.
f) State and federal jurisdictional issues associated with
the restructuring effort and an examination of current
policies with the goal of facilitating coordination between
state and federal efforts.
2) Double join with AB 1890 (Brulte), pending in the Assembly.
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown
AB 1890
Page 2
EXISTING LAW vests the PUC with regulatory authority over public
utilities.
AS PASSED BY THE ASSEMBLY, this bill required the PUC's decision
to restructure the electrical services industry, and the orders
implementing that decision, comply with specific criteria, such as
1) establishing a definite
period for the transition to a competitive market, and; 2)
establishing a methodology for CTC determination and recovery.
BACKGROUND: This bill is intended to go to the joint conference
committee on electrical restructuring in conjunction with AB 3153
(Martinez). The Senate has two vehicles, SB 1139 (Mountjoy) and
SB 1141 (Costa), slated for the joint committee. The Senate
vehicles were voted out of the Assembly last week. This bill was
substantially amended in the Senate and has not been reviewed by
an Assembly policy committee.
ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT: None
ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION: None
Analysis prepared by: John G. Larrea / auc / (916) 445-4246
FN
026071